Hybrid Concrete Construction
South Africa has been slow to
realise the benefits of hybrid concrete construction (HCC), despite the
widely appreciated construction benefits. One of the barriers to the
use of HCC has been the lack of comprehensive guidance. Hybrid concrete
construction can be described as being 'best of both worlds'. It
marries together the advantages of precast and insitu concrete
construction with often significant benefits. For example, the adoption
of a hybrid concrete frame instead of a composite steel frame on a
shell-and core office project in central London resulted in
construction savings of 29 percent and a 13 percent increase in net
lettable floor area.
The time is right for hybrid
construction. Reports such as Accelerating Change from the
Strategic Forum for Construction and the Egan Rethinking Construction
report have focused attention on the need for the UK construction
industry to move on from its inherent conservatism and modernise and
increase efficiency. The business environment of the UK construction
industry is changing. If the industry is to answer its critics and
modernise, then it has to examine the potential of different
construction techniques and contractual arrangements.
In terms of costs, insitu
reinforced concrete is commonly viewed as being the most economic
framing option while precast concrete promotes speed and factory
quality. Combining the two as a hybrid frame results in even greater
construction speed, quality and overall economy. Traditional formwork
typically accounts for up to 40 percent of an insitu frame costs. These
costs can be significantly reduced by increasing the use of precast
concrete which has no on-site formwork requirement. This reduces the
duration of operations critical to the overall construction programme.
Precasting is not constrained by site progress or conditions and can
continue independently of on-site operations. Some HCC techniques can
remove the need for follow-on trades such as ceilings and finishes.
This allows for an even faster programme. HCC also encourages speed of
construction by promoting increased buildability, which should be a
fundamental design objective.
Concrete produces robust, and
adaptable buildings that are inherently fire resistant, vibration free
and quiet. Exposure of the hybrid concrete frame can be used to exploit
concrete's inherent thermal properties in naturally ventilated,
low-energy buildings. The finish and shape of the exposed units can
also assist with even distribution of lighting levels and the reduction
of noise levels. Long spans can be easily achieved using large units or
by pre-stressing or post-tensioning.
HCC is about providing best
value. It is not necessarily about first cost, although this alone can
result in hybrid concrete construction being chosen. Gains from
improved buildability on site soon overtake any material cost
differences. Inherent benefits, such as occupier comfort and increased
efficiency, lead to potentially massive cost benefits in comparison
with other structural approaches. For the full potential of economy,
safety, speed, buildability and performance to be realised then HCC
should be considered at the beginning of the design process. The new
best practice guidance shows how that full potential can be achieved.
BEAM AND BLOCK
A common example of HCC would be the “ Beam and Block” method of
construction. Beam and block slabs are made up of precast concrete
rectangular shaped beams. The most common beam spacings being 560, 600
and 650mm. A non structural topping should have a minimum strength of
25 MPa at 28 days and a minimum thickness of 40 , mm, or 1/10
multiplied by the clear distance between the beams. Welded mesh
reinforcement is placed in this topping to control possible shrinkage
cracks. The filler blocks are available in different heights ranging
from 60 mm to 350 mm which produces an overall depth of slab from 110
mm to 400 mm, or more if double blocks are used. This type of slab
requires temporary supports at approximately 1.5 m centres, but certain
systems can also be designed to eliminate the need for props. The
advantages of this type of slab are as follows:
- It provides an economical, versatile
lightweight monolithic slab system. Components are relatively light and
no mechanical handling is necessary.
- Slabs may be designed as either simply
supported or fully continuous.
- They are ideal for soffit plaster but
fixing of suspended ceilings is also easy and simple.
- Electrical and plumbing services are
readily catered for by omitting hollow blocks at specific locations.
Design guidelines
Beam and block system slabs are
designed as a series of ‘T’ sections with the in situ cast concrete
providingthe compression flange and the recast beam the tension
reinforcement. The beams and the composite slab are designed for
specific spans and loads and are reinforced accordingly, (complying
with the relevant Code of Practice.) Two or more beams may be placed
together to accommodate concentrated line loads parallel to the span.
If necessary, blocks may be omitted over the support to increase the
shear capacity.
PANEL AND TOPPING
The panel consists of a precast
reinforced or prestressed slab utilized essentially as a permanent
shutter with tensile reinforcement included, acting compositely with an
in situ structural topping. The panels may be produced in relatively
narrow widths to facilitate manual erection or in a wide configuration
(up to 2,4 metres) offering greater speed but requiring mechanical
handling. In some situations, reinforcement in the form of a lattice
girder may be incorporated to provide stiffness during handling.
Reinforcement is placed in the topping over supports and over the
joints between precast units.
By varying the tensile reinforcement in the panel and/or the strength
and thickness of the topping concrete, different loadings and spans can
be accommodated. Projecting steel is not normally required at the
precast/in situ concrete interface in solid composite construction.
Design can be simply supported or fully continuous.
Depending on the the system, selected treatment to the soffit may or
may not be required.
CASE STUDY
VOLKSWAGEN
PAINTSHOP- UITENHAGE
OWNER: VW South Africa
ENGINEER: ARQ Consulting
Engineers
PRINCIPAL AGENT: Sigma
Consulting
PROJECT MANAGER: Peter
Meidlinger,
Grinaker-LTA Civil Engineering
CONTRACTOR: Grinaker-LTA Civil
Engineering and
Grinaker-LTA Building Eastern Cape
The reasons for using Hybrid
construction included speed, and access to below the slab - no time for
curing and stripping conventional formwork.
|